Posted by: edhensley | December 6, 2015

Do God and the Bible Forbid Christmas Trees?

Jeremiah 10 NIV

1 Hear what the LORD says to you, O house of Israel. 2 This is what the LORD says:
“Do not learn the ways of the nations
or be terrified by signs in the sky,
though the nations are terrified by them.
3 For the customs of the peoples are worthless;
they cut a tree out of the forest,
and a craftsman shapes it with his chisel.
4 They adorn it with silver and gold;
they fasten it with hammer and nails
so it will not totter.

King James Version

3For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.

Hebrew Masoretic Text
3 For the customs of the peoples are vanity; for it is but a tree which one cutteth out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman with the axe.
3 because the precepts of the nations are vain: there is a tree from the forest, cut down, a work of a craftsman, and a molten image.

5 Like a scarecrow in a melon patch,
their idols cannot speak;
they must be carried
because they cannot walk.
Do not fear them;
they can do no harm
nor can they do any good.”

I originally posted this in 2010. The comments on this blog heat up every year. I changed the title from “God and the Bible Forbid Christmas Trees” to “Do God and the Bible Forbid Christmas Trees?” Like almost all Christian doctrines and beliefs, the answer to this question depends upon the interpretation of the scripture. I am reposting so comments can be more clearly directed.

This passage is often ignored by Christians at Christmas, because it appears to forbid cutting down a tree, bringing it into your home, and decorating it. There are several Christian sects today that forbid Christmas trees due to this passage. This first post laments the change of “axe” to “chisel” by some translations.

Other Christian sects claim that Christmas trees are fine.

Most Christians who are aware of this verse claim it is about idolatry and not about Christmas trees. This is an Old Testament passage, so obviously it could not be a Christmas tree. Also, they note that in many modern translations the word chisel is used, indicating that the tree was not really a tree but a carved idol. The NIV uses the word chisel. The KJV uses the word axe, as does the Hebrew Masoretic Text.  The Septuagint does not use axe or chisel, but calls the tree a “molten image” in verse 3. Once again, the different translations are a source of confusion.

Further verses show that the context of this passage is clearly about the worship of idols. However, verses 3 and 4 are still strong statements against cutting down trees and bringing them into a house to decorate, and these verses are a direct quote from God.

Furthermore, God states clearly that he does not like the customs of other people (non Jews).  There are multiple non-Jewish origins of decorating trees that pre-date the Christmas tree. Ancient (and modern) pagans would cut boughs of evergreens for decoration in their homes. Ancient Egyptians decorated their homes with palm tree branches. Greeks decorated evergreen trees as part of worship of their god Adonia. Pagan Romans would decorate trees with metal and replicas of Bacchus, a fertility god. Germans tied fruit and candles to trees in honor of their god Woden.  Christians can not accurately claim that decorating a tree is not related to pagan idol worship.

The second-century Christian theologian Tertullian condemned those Christians who celebrated the winter festivals, or decorated their houses with laurel boughs in honor of the emperor:  “Let them over whom the fires of hell are imminent, affix to their posts, laurels doomed presently to burn: to them the testimonies of darkness and the omens of their penalties are suitable. You are a light of the world, and a tree ever green. If you have renounced temples, make not your own gate a temple.” Other Christian leaders condemned the “pagan” practice of christmas trees, including the Pilgrim’s second governor, William Bradford. The Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Worldwide Church of God (recent post at and many fundamentalist Christian groups still forbid Christmas trees. Notice the Worldwide Church of God link mentions Jeremiah 10 as well. And before I get lots of comments from members of the “true” church of God, I will acknowledge that there are multiple splinter groups of the Worldwide Church of God and they differ in beliefs on this issue.


Most Christians, however, continue to ignore this passage and any other passage in the bible that contradicts their opinions. Others are aware of this passage but interpret it differently.



  1. I’m an atheist. I learned of this passage recently and found it really amusing. Hypocrisy abounds.

  2. Oh don’t be silly. Its a clear condemnation of people adopting the paganistic practices and associated idol worship that were common in the surrounding nations. Its in a similar vein to the condemnation of marking the skin for similar purposes. To try and insinuate some objective evil in the mere cutting down of a tree is quite ridiculous.

    It has nothing whatsoever to do with Christmas trees but graven images that lured Israel into apostasy.

    You may though have a point about hypocrisy, but it would be the hypocrisy of those who put up a tree for ‘winterval’ celebrations in some meta-paganistic fashion themselves and then damn actual Christians who are keeping the spirit of the text u quote by using the tree for its original intended purposes.

    This is just another example of straw man arguments atheists are so keen on and typical of the ‘exegesis’ on this website.Though I’m sure you had fun playing with your Lego sketches whilst laughing at how infantile those Christians are.

    I hear Lego technik is quite fun, I’m buying my 4 year old nephew some for Christmas, but I’m sure he won’t be able to construct circumcision scenes quite like you can.

    Please feel free to delete this post if you so wish or ‘bitch’ about me in a reply, I shan’t respond I’ve already wasted enough time here.

    • I am not the one who is claiming that God and the bible forbid Christmas trees. There are MANY Christian sects who make this claim, and I provided links to several.
      Regarding the Lego scenes, these were created by the author of and thebrickbible websites. I have used the images with permission and included the website in the caption. This website is now available in book forms at These books would make excellent gifts for your nephew.

  3. OK, so I didn’t sleep well last night. I feel guilty for being so snide and condescending to you. I remain disappointed at the content of your argument but I shouldn’t have made it personal. I’m sorry for this.

    If I couldn’t be bothered to engage with you on a more intellectual level then I should have just kept my thoughts to myself. If you want to make little Lego sketches for the amusement of atheists then you’re free to do so. If I dislike them, and I do find them distasteful, then I should simply have left the website: though I do acknowledge a degree of creativity here and skill in the composition of the photos.

    I’m quite sure God gave you these obvious skills for the glory of his kingdom and ‘the healing of the nations’ but you’ve decided to ‘use’ these gifts in other ways.

    Anyway, I hope life goes well with you and you manage to move past this God hating phase. Hopefully someday you will use your skills for Gods good purposes but until then may peace be with you.

    OK, now I won’t return to this website, Happy Christmas… And chill out over the trees OK.

  4. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha @ Nathan

    You can’t hate what doesn’t exist.

    And I’m sorry you find YOUR OWN BOOK distasteful.

    LOL what a joke.

  5. Where did Nathan ever say he found *his own book*, assuming you mean the Bible, distasteful..?

    • Hi April,

      Thanks for joining the conversation! Sorry you had trouble reading Nathan’s comment.

      Once you re-read it, you might notice he wrote quite plainly: “If I dislike them, and I do find them distasteful,” in reference to depictions of scenes from the collection of mostly horrible and frightening fables known as the bible.

      I called it “his own book” because (1) the word bible is quite a traumatic word since it is historically and presently a tool of violence against so many people and I try to avoid using words like that unless absolutely necessary for understanding, and (2) he is the one using an imaginary creature from that disgusting mythology in an attempt to degrade another human being and therefore he is making a moral stand behind that book (even though it’s an illogical one) and therefore may be freely associated with that book by others as though it is his own.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: